-let and = \l r. l r false in
-(
- (and true true yes no)
- (and true false yes no)
- (and false true yes no)
- (and false false yes no)
-)
-</textarea>
-<input id="PARSE" value="Normalize" type="button">
-<input id="ETA" type="checkbox">do eta-reductions too
-<noscript><p>You may not see it because you have JavaScript turned off. Uffff!</p></noscript>
-<script src="/code/lambda.js"></script>
-<script src="/code/tokens.js"></script>
-<script src="/code/parse.js"></script>
-<script src="/code/json2.js"></script>
-<pre id="OUTPUT">
+let and = \l r. l (r true false) false in
+
+; version 1 lists
+let makePair = \f s g. g f s in
+let fst = true in
+let snd = false in
+let nil = makePair true meh in
+let isNil = \x. x fst in
+let makeList = \h t. makePair false (makePair h t) in
+let head = \l. isNil l err (l snd fst) in
+let tail = \l. isNil l err (l snd snd) in
+
+; a list of numbers to experiment on
+let mylist = makeList 1 (makeList 2 (makeList 3 nil)) in
+
+; a fixed-point combinator for defining recursive functions
+let Y = \f. (\h. f (h h)) (\h. f (h h)) in
+
+; church numerals
+let isZero = \n. n (\x. false) true in
+let succ = \n s z. s (n s z) in
+let mult = \m n s. m (n s) in
+let length = Y (\length l. isNil l 0 (succ (length (tail l)))) in
+let pred = \n. isZero n 0 (length (tail (n (\p. makeList meh p) nil))) in
+let leq = \m n. isZero(n pred m) in
+let eq = \m n. and (leq m n)(leq n m) in
+
+eq 2 2 yes no
+</pre>
+
+
+Then `length mylist` evaluates to 3.
+
+1. What does `head (tail (tail mylist))` evaluate to?
+
+2. Using the `length` function as a model, and using the predecessor
+function, write a function that computes factorials. (Recall that n!,
+the factorial of n, is n times the factorial of n-1.)
+
+Warning: my browser isn't able to compute factorials of numbers
+greater than 2 (it does't provide enough resources for the JavaScript
+interpreter; web pages are not supposed to be that computationally
+intensive).
+
+3. (Easy) Write a function `listLenEq` that returns true just in case two lists have the
+same length. That is,
+
+ listLenEq mylist (makeList meh (makeList meh (makeList meh nil))) ~~> true
+
+ listLenEq mylist (makeList meh (makeList meh nil))) ~~> false
+
+
+4. (Still easy) Now write the same function, but don't use the length function.
+
+5. In assignment 2, we discovered that version 3-type lists (the ones that
+work like Church numerals) made it much easier to define operations
+like `map` and `filter`. But now that we have recursion in our toolbox,
+reasonable map and filter functions for version 1 lists are within our
+reach. Give definitions for `map` and a `filter` for verson 1 type lists.
+
+#Computing with trees#
+
+Linguists analyze natural language expressions into trees.
+We'll need trees in future weeks, and tree structures provide good
+opportunities for learning how to write recursive functions.
+Making use of the resources we have at the moment, we can approximate
+trees as follows: instead of words, we'll use Church numerals.
+Then a tree will be a (version 1 type) list in which each element is
+itself a tree. For simplicity, we'll adopt the convention that
+a tree of length 1 must contain a number as its only element.
+Then we have the following representations:
+
+<pre>
+ (a) (b) (c)
+ .
+ /|\ /\ /\
+ / | \ /\ 3 1 /\
+ 1 2 3 1 2 2 3
+
+[[1];[2];[3]] [[[1];[2]];[3]] [[1];[[2];[3]]]