-11. [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007. pp 103ff
+11. [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff.
12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
13. Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object"
12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
13. Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object"
@@ -61,10+59,16 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
15. The types of continuations; continuations as first-class values
16. [Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
15. The types of continuations; continuations as first-class values
16. [Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
+17. [Phil/ling application] Expletives
+
+18. Some references:
+ * de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics
+ * on donkey anaphora and continuations
+ * Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi
-17. Dependent types
+19. Dependent types
-### Side-effects and mutation ###
+## Side-effects and mutation ##
1. What difference imperativity makes
2. Monads we've seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)
1. What difference imperativity makes
2. Monads we've seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)
@@ -73,26+77,26 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
5. Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
6. [Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs"
5. Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
6. [Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs"
-7. Montague / Yoad Winter? (just have this written down in my notes, I assume Chris will remember the reference)
+7. Montague / Ben-avi and Winter, [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
8. Passing by reference
8. Passing by reference
-9. [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor or "coordinated contents"
+9. [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents"
-### Continuations (continued) ###
+## Continuations (continued) ##
-1. Using CPS to handle abortive computations
+1. Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure)
2. Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
3. Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
2. Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
3. Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
-4. Delimited continuations
+4. Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
5. [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
5. [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
-### Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ###
+## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##
1. Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
2. Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)
3. Linear logic
1. Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
2. Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)
3. Linear logic
-4. [Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice
+4. [Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice, imperatives