+4. (Still easy) Now write the same function, but don't use the length
+function.
+
+5. In assignment 2, we discovered that version 3-type lists (the ones
+that
+work like Church numerals) made it much easier to define operations
+like `map` and `filter`. But now that we have recursion in our
+toolbox,
+reasonable map and filter functions for version 1 lists are within our
+reach. Give definitions for `map` and a `filter` for verson 1 type
+lists.
+
+#Computing with trees#
+
+Linguists analyze natural language expressions into trees.
+We'll need trees in future weeks, and tree structures provide good
+opportunities for learning how to write recursive functions.
+Making use of the resources we have at the moment, we can approximate
+trees as follows: instead of words, we'll use Church numerals.
+Then a tree will be a (version 1 type) list in which each element is
+itself a tree. For simplicity, we'll adopt the convention that
+a tree of length 1 must contain a number as its only element.
+Then we have the following representations:
+
+<pre>
+ (a) (b) (c)
+ .
+ /|\ /\ /\
+ / | \ /\ 3 1 /\
+ 1 2 3 1 2 2 3
+
+[[1];[2];[3]] [[[1];[2]];[3]] [[1];[[2];[3]]]
+</pre>
+
+Limitations of this scheme include the following: there is no easy way
+to label a constituent with a syntactic category (S or NP or VP,
+etc.), and there is no way to represent a tree in which a mother has a
+single daughter.