-To be added.
+This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended scope.
+
+
+## Introduction ##
+
+1. Declarative vs imperatival models of computation.
+2. Variety of ways in which "order can matter."
+3. Variety of meanings for "dynamic."
+4. Schoenfinkel, Curry, Church: a brief history
+5. Functions as "first-class values"
+6. "Curried" functions
+
+## The "pure" or untyped lambda calculus ##
+
+1. Beta reduction
+1. Substitution; using alpha-conversion and other strategies
+1. Conversion versus reduction
+1. Eta reduction and "extensionality"
+1. Different evaluation strategies (call by name, call by value, etc.)
+1. Strongly normalizing vs weakly normalizing vs non-normalizing; Church-Rosser Theorem(s)
+1. Lambda calculus compared to combinatorial logic<p>
+1. Encoding pairs (and triples and ...)
+1. Encoding booleans
+1. Church-like encodings of numbers, defining addition and multiplication
+1. Defining the predecessor function; alternate encodings for the numbers
+1. Homogeneous sequences or "lists"; how they differ from pairs, triples, etc.
+1. Representing lists as pairs
+1. Representing lists as folds
+1. Typical higher-order functions: map, filter, fold<p>
+1. Recursion exploiting the fold-like representation of numbers and lists ([[!wikipedia Deforestation (computer science)]], [[!wikipedia Zipper (data structure)]])
+1. General recursion using omega
+1. The Y combinator(s); more on evaluation strategies<p>
+1. Introducing the notion of a "continuation", which technique we'll now already have used a few times
+
+## Types ##
+
+1. Product or record types, e.g. pairs and triples
+2. Sum or variant types; tagged or "disjoint" unions
+3. Maybe/option types; representing "out-of-band" values
+4. Zero/bottom types
+5. Unit type
+6. Inductive types (numbers, lists)
+7. "Pattern-matching" or type unpacking<p>
+8. The simply-typed lambda calculus<p>
+9. Parametric polymorphism, System F, "type inference"<p>
+10. [Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
+ <!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> --><p>
+11. [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. [which paper?](http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jeffreck/pub.php)
+12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
+13. Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf)<p>
+14. Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic<p>
+15. The types of continuations; continuations as first-class values
+16. [Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
+17. [Phil/ling application] Expletives<p>
+18. Some references:
+ * [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf)
+ * [on donkey anaphora and continuations](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
+ * [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf)
+19. Dependent types
+
+## Side-effects and mutation ##
+
+1. What difference imperativity makes
+2. Monads we've already seen, and the "monadic laws" [computer science version: Wadler](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/marktoberdorf/baastad.pdf)
+3. Side-effects in a purely functional setting, via monads
+4. The basis of monads in category theory
+5. Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad<p>
+6. [Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs" [not sure which paper]
+7. Montague / Ben-avi and Winter, [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)<p>
+8. Passing by reference
+9. [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt))
+
+## Continuations (continued) ##
+
+1. Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure, expressives)
+2. Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
+3. Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
+4. Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
+5. [Phil/ling application] [Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
+
+## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##
+
+1. Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
+2. Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)
+3. Linear logic
+4. [Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice, imperatives
+
+