From f18d270f9c73466e1ec28afb184a0fdb3fc343af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jim
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:26:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] unfortunately, the infinite arithmetic question's arguments
need to be flipped
---
exercises/_assignment4.mdwn | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exercises/_assignment4.mdwn b/exercises/_assignment4.mdwn
index 33c7e779..226741e1 100644
--- a/exercises/_assignment4.mdwn
+++ b/exercises/_assignment4.mdwn
@@ -107,10 +107,10 @@ satisfies the following constraints, for any finite natural number `n`:
n ^ inf == inf
leq n inf == true
- (Note, though, that with some notions of infinite numbers, operations like `+` and `*` are defined in such a way that `inf + n` is different from `n + inf`, and does exceed `inf`.)
+ (Note, though, that with *some* notions of infinite numbers, like [[!wiki ordinal numers]], operations like `+` and `*` are defined in such a way that `inf + n` is different from `n + inf`, and does exceed `inf`.)
-9. Prove that `add 1 Î¾ <~~> Î¾`, where `Î¾` is the fixed
-point you found in (1). What about `add 2 Î¾ <~~> Î¾`?
+9. Prove that `add Î¾ 1 <~~> Î¾`, where `Î¾` is the fixed
+point you found in (1). What about `add Î¾ 2 <~~> Î¾`?
Comment: a fixed point for the successor function is an object such that it
is unchanged after adding 1 to it. It makes a certain amount of sense
--
2.11.0