From f010b6253a11fa1af068c3f1c22f27f10867bbfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jim Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:48:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] formatting --- week9.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/week9.mdwn b/week9.mdwn index d659e750..7c6f7de9 100644 --- a/week9.mdwn +++ b/week9.mdwn @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ Programming languages tend to provide a bunch of mutation-related capabilities a * Now would be a good time to go back and review some material from [[week1]], and seeing how much we've learned. There's discussion back then of declarative or functional languages versus languages using imperatival features, like mutation. Mutation is distinguished from shadowing. There's discussion of sequencing, and of what we mean by saying "order matters." -In point 7 of the Rosetta Stone discussion, the contrast between call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation order appears (though we don't yet call it that). We'll be discussing that more in coming weeks. In the [[damn]] example, continuations and other kinds of side-effects (namely, printing) make an appearance. These too will be center-stage in coming weeks. + In point 7 of the Rosetta Stone discussion, the contrast between call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation order appears (though we don't yet call it that). We'll be discussing that more in coming weeks. In the [[damn]] example, continuations and other kinds of side-effects (namely, printing) make an appearance. These too will be center-stage in coming weeks. -- 2.11.0