From ea0b194da931da58e613e5af889d65486b104cd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Pryor Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:27:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] week1: tweaks Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor --- week1.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/week1.mdwn b/week1.mdwn index 12890be9..5d482c4c 100644 --- a/week1.mdwn +++ b/week1.mdwn @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ It's possible to enhance the lambda calculus so that functions do get identified It's often said that dynamic systems are distinguished because they are the ones in which **order matters**. However, there are many ways in which order can matter. If we have a trivalent boolean system, for example---easily had in a purely functional calculus---we might choose to give a truth-table like this for "and": -true and true = true + true and true = true And then we'd notice that `* and false` has a different intepretation than `false and *`. (The same phenomenon is already present with the material conditional in bivalent logics; but seeing that a non-symmetric semantics for `and` is available even for functional languages is instructive.) -- 2.11.0