From 7bffcdc79c27f459cb7d451f23b4ce8e5b39b125 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Pryor
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:18:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] reword assignment 2
Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor
---
assignment2.mdwn | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/assignment2.mdwn b/assignment2.mdwn
index c60f50e8..066f1b1f 100644
--- a/assignment2.mdwn
+++ b/assignment2.mdwn
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ For these exercises, assume that `LIST` is the result of evaluating:
should evaluate to a list containing just those of `a`, `b`, `c`, `d`, and `e` such that `f` applied to them evaluates to `true`.
-How would you implement map using the either the version 1 or the version 2 implementation of lists?
+What goes wrong when we try to apply these techniques using the version 1 or version 2 implementation of lists?
Our version 3 implementation of the numbers are usually called "Church numerals". If `m` is a Church numeral, then `m s z` applies the function `s` to the result of applying `s` to ... to `z`, for a total of *m* applications of `s`, where *m* is the number that `m` represents or encodes.
--
2.11.0