From 73468d0b4529a8dc0fd0ac47f4b2fdc4af94c3ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jim Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:27:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] don't inline image --- rosetta1.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rosetta1.mdwn b/rosetta1.mdwn index ec849e68..1ae24607 100644 --- a/rosetta1.mdwn +++ b/rosetta1.mdwn @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ## Can you summarize the differences between your made-up language and Scheme, OCaml, and Haskell? ## -The made-up language we wet our toes in in week 1 is called Kapulet. (I'll tell you [[the story behind its name|randj.jpg]] sometime.) The purpose of starting with this language is that it represents something of a center of gravity between Scheme, OCaml, and Haskell, and also lacks many of their idiosyncratic warts. One downside is that it's not yet implemented in a form that you can run on your computers. So for now, if you want to try out your code on a real mechanical evaluator, you'll need to use one of the other languages. +The made-up language we wet our toes in in week 1 is called Kapulet. (I'll tell you [the story behind its name](randj.jpg) sometime.) The purpose of starting with this language is that it represents something of a center of gravity between Scheme, OCaml, and Haskell, and also lacks many of their idiosyncratic warts. One downside is that it's not yet implemented in a form that you can run on your computers. So for now, if you want to try out your code on a real mechanical evaluator, you'll need to use one of the other languages. Also, if you want to read code written outside this seminar, or have others read your code, for these reasons too you'll need to make the shift over to one of the established languages. -- 2.11.0