From: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:57:25 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: reader: tweaking markup
X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=f08c2ba23b0d6ffec440219aa64f27ec7bd3ae62

reader: tweaking markup

Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>
---

diff --git a/reader_monad.mdwn b/reader_monad.mdwn
index a246e4fe..ef049d5b 100644
--- a/reader_monad.mdwn
+++ b/reader_monad.mdwn
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ I guess you haven't you been paying close enough attention, or you don't have mu
 
 In Heim and Kratzer's textbook <cite>Semantics in Generative Grammar</cite>, the interpretation of complex phrases like \[[interprets complex phrases]] are trees that look like this:
 
-<blockquote>
+<blockquote><pre>
 				VP
 			  /    \
 			 /      \
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ In Heim and Kratzer's textbook <cite>Semantics in Generative Grammar</cite>, the
 \[[interprets]]    AP         N
 				  / \         |
 			  \[[complex]] \[[phrases]]
-</blockquote>
+</pre></blockquote>
 
 
 Now the normal way in which the nodes of such trees are related to each other is that the semantic value of a parent node is the result of applying the functional value of one of the daughter nodes to the value of the other daughter node. (The types determine which side is the function and which side is the argument.) One exception to this general rule is when multiple adjectives are joined together, as happens in \[[interprets complex English phrases]]. We'll ignore that though.