From: barker <barker@web>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:42:01 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: (no commit message)
X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=b6d595a7debc79f07cfc3c364a8ceaab96185386

---

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index d4c94db2..753c058a 100644
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 ## The "pure" or untyped lambda calculus ##
 
 1.	Beta reduction
-2.	Subtitution; using alpha-conversion and other strategies
+2.	Substitution; using alpha-conversion and other strategies
 3.	Conversion versus Reduction
 4.	Eta reduction and "extensionality"
-5.	Different evaluation strategies
+5.	Different evaluation strategies (call by name, call by value, etc.)
 6.	Strongly normalizing vs weakly normalizing vs non-normalizing; Church-Rosser Theorem(s)
 
 7.	Encoding pairs (and triples and ...)
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 16.	[Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
 17.	[Phil/ling application] Expletives
 
-18.	Misc references: Chris?
-	*	de Groeten on lambda-mu and linguistics?
+18.	Some references: 
+	*	de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics
 	*	on donkey anaphora and continuations
 	*	Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi
 
@@ -77,18 +77,18 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 5.	Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
 
 6.	[Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs"
-7.	Montague / Yoad Winter? (just have this written down in my notes, I assume Chris will remember the reference)
+7.	Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
 
 8.	Passing by reference
-9.	[Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor or "coordinated contents"
+9.	[Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents"
 
 
 ## Continuations (continued) ##
 
-1.	Using CPS to handle abortive computations
+1.	Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure)
 2.	Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
 3.	Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
-4.	Delimited continuations
+4.	Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
 5.	[Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
 
 
@@ -97,6 +97,6 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 1.	Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
 2.	Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)
 3.	Linear logic
-4.	[Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice
+4.	[Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice, imperatives