From: chris <chris@web>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:23:16 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: (no commit message)
X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=92b29e26e2757114e378add97be8ccc111d3fea0

---

diff --git a/topics/_week6_plexy.mdwn b/topics/_week6_plexy.mdwn
index caf3e69d..b93c29eb 100644
--- a/topics/_week6_plexy.mdwn
+++ b/topics/_week6_plexy.mdwn
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ meaning.
 more complicated expression that, he argues, refers to Plexy, but this
 nicety is not crucial to our discussion here.)
 
+## Types to the rescue
+
 Kaplan's solution is, in effect, to impose a type system on his
 grammar in such a way that structured meanings cannot be confused with
 the referent of a directly-referential term.  He suggests that the
@@ -65,6 +67,8 @@ class of objects that a directly referential term can refer to, and
 the class of objects that can serve as the complex structure
 corresponding to a DP that is not directly referential.
 
+## Motivating Maybe
+
 Kaplan goes on to use this solution to attack a different problem, the
 problem of non-referring names.  Russell supposed that if a name had
 no referent (e.g., *Santa*), a sentence containing that name would