From: Jim Pryor Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:25:47 +0000 (-0400) Subject: week1: tweaks X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=90195a1256127fd9f962d65af8e9cde5328273a1 week1: tweaks Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor --- diff --git a/week1.mdwn b/week1.mdwn index c1759a37..fb95b18f 100644 --- a/week1.mdwn +++ b/week1.mdwn @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ It's often said that dynamic systems are distinguished because they are the ones true and true = true -And then we'd notice that * and false has a different intepretation than false and *. (The same phenomenon is already present with the material conditional in bivalent logics; but seeing that a non-symmetric semantics for `and` is available even for functional languages is instructive.) +And then we'd notice that `* and false` has a different intepretation than false and *. (The same phenomenon is already present with the material conditional in bivalent logics; but seeing that a non-symmetric semantics for `and` is available even for functional languages is instructive.) Another way in which order can matter that's present even in functional languages is that the interpretation of some complex expressions can depend on the order in which sub-expressions are evaluated. Evaluated in one order, the computations might never terminate (and so semantically we interpret them as having "the bottom value"---we'll discuss this). Evaluated in another order, they might have a perfectly mundane value. Here's an example, though we'll reserve discussion of it until later: