From: barker Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:59:04 +0000 (-0400) Subject: (no commit message) X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8acfe79c880b2116b25ce38be8328a3eee36daff --- diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn index f8e054e4..c9d75905 100644 --- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn +++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn @@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s 10. [Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic -11. [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. +11. [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. [which paper?](http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jeffreck/pub.php) 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators -13. Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object" +13. Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf) 14. Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s 17. [Phil/ling application] Expletives 18. Some references: - * de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics + * [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf) * on donkey anaphora and continuations - * Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi + * [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf) 19. Dependent types @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s 7. Montague / Ben-avi and Winter, [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927) 8. Passing by reference -9. [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt) +9. [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt)) ## Continuations (continued) ## @@ -88,8 +88,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s 2. Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines 3. Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation) 4. Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations -5. [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora - +5. [Phil/ling application] [Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1) ## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##