From: chris <chris@web>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:36:27 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: (no commit message)
X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6dd776e960ebf61436ffc43103e9149a8be2e637

---

diff --git a/topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator.mdwn b/topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator.mdwn
index 9c3ac87a..34c4e1cb 100644
--- a/topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator.mdwn
+++ b/topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator.mdwn
@@ -365,14 +365,14 @@ wait until we have Continuation Passing Style transforms.
 The answer to the first question (Can we adjust the OCaml evaluator to
 exhibit lazy behavior?) is quite simple:
 
-    let rec reduce_lazy (t : term) : term = match t with
+    let rec reduce_try3 (t : term) : term = match t with
       | I -> I
       | K -> K
       | S -> S
       | App (a, b) -> 
-          let t' = App (reduce_lazy a, b) in
+          let t' = App (reduce_try3 a, b) in
           if (is_redex t') then let t'' = reduce_if_redex t'
-                                in reduce_lazy t''
+                                in reduce_try3 t''
                            else t'
 
 There is only one small difference from `reduce_try2`: instead of setting `t'` to `App
@@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ There is only one small difference from `reduce_try2`: instead of setting `t'` t
 subexpression at all.  Ever!  The only way to get evaluated is to
 somehow get into functor position.
 
-    # reduce3 (App(App(K,I),skomega));;
+    # reduce_try3 (App(App(K,I),skomega));;
     - : term = I
-    # reduce3 skomega;;
+    # reduce_try3 skomega;;
     C-c C-cInterrupted.
 
 The evaluator now has no trouble finding the normal form for `KIΩ`,