projects
/
lambda.git
/ commitdiff
commit
grep
author
committer
pickaxe
?
search:
re
summary
|
shortlog
|
log
|
commit
| commitdiff |
tree
raw
|
patch
|
inline
| side by side (parent:
9e24913
)
edits
author
Chris
<chris.barker@nyu.edu>
Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:18:06 +0000
(15:18 -0400)
committer
Chris
<chris.barker@nyu.edu>
Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:18:06 +0000
(15:18 -0400)
topics/_week10_gsv.mdwn
patch
|
blob
|
history
diff --git
a/topics/_week10_gsv.mdwn
b/topics/_week10_gsv.mdwn
index
d617594
..
f033612
100644
(file)
--- a/
topics/_week10_gsv.mdwn
+++ b/
topics/_week10_gsv.mdwn
@@
-60,7
+60,7
@@
On the epistemic side, GSV aim to account for asymmetries such as
It might be raining. It's not raining.
#It's not raining. It might be raining.
It might be raining. It's not raining.
#It's not raining. It might be raining.
-##
Basic
s
+##
Two-part assignment function
s
There are a lot of formal details in the paper in advance of the
empirical discussion. Here are the ones that matter for our purposes:
There are a lot of formal details in the paper in advance of the
empirical discussion. Here are the ones that matter for our purposes:
@@
-328,7
+328,7
@@
that asserting *might* requires that the prejacent be undecided, you
will have to consider an update rule for the diamond on which update
with the prejacent and its negation must both be non-empty.
will have to consider an update rule for the diamond on which update
with the prejacent and its negation must both be non-empty.
-##
B
inding
+##
Order and b
inding
The GSV fragment differs from the DPL and the DMG dynamic semantics in
important details. Nevertheless, it has more or less the same things
The GSV fragment differs from the DPL and the DMG dynamic semantics in
important details. Nevertheless, it has more or less the same things
@@
-578,7
+578,7
@@
object that it can refer to. Here is what GSV say:
A term is an identifier per se if no mattter what the information
state is, it cannot fail to decie what the denotation of the term is.
A term is an identifier per se if no mattter what the information
state is, it cannot fail to decie what the denotation of the term is.
-## Why
articulate the mapping from variables to objects into two parts
?
+## Why
have a two-part assignment function
?
In the current system, variables are associated with values in two
steps.
In the current system, variables are associated with values in two
steps.