schedule tweaks

Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index b2ae2d9..eda1a1d 100644 (file)
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
-## Schedule of Topics ##
-
 This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended scope.
 
 
-### Introduction ###
+## Introduction ##
 
 1.     Declarative vs imperatival models of computation.
 2.     Variety of ways in which "order can matter."
@@ -12,7 +10,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 5.     Functions as "first-class values"
 6.     "Curried" functions
 
-### The "pure" or untyped lambda calculus ###
+## The "pure" or untyped lambda calculus ##
 
 1.     Beta reduction
 2.     Subtitution; using alpha-conversion and other strategies
@@ -36,11 +34,11 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 
 18.    Introducing the notion of a "continuation", which technique we'll now already have used a few times
 
-### Types ###
+## Types ##
 
 1.     Product or record types, e.g. pairs and triples
 2.     Sum or variant types; tagged or "disjoint" unions
-3.     Maybe/option types
+3.     Maybe/option types; representing "out-of-band" values
 4.     Zero/bottom types
 5.     Unit type
 6.     Inductive types (numbers, lists)
@@ -53,7 +51,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 10.    [Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
        <!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> -->
 
-11.    [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007. pp 103ff
+11.    [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff.
 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
 13.    Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object"
 
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 
 17.    Dependent types
 
-### Side-effects and mutation ###
+## Side-effects and mutation ##
 
 1.     What difference imperativity makes
 2.     Monads we've seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)
@@ -79,7 +77,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor or "coordinated contents"
 
 
-### Continuations (continued) ###
+## Continuations (continued) ##
 
 1.     Using CPS to handle abortive computations
 2.     Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
@@ -88,7 +86,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 5.     [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
 
 
-### Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ###
+## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##
 
 1.     Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
 2.     Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)