week1: fix markup processing?

Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>

diff --git a/week1.mdwn b/week1.mdwn
index 36ebdfc..6773a77 100644 (file)
--- a/week1.mdwn
+++ b/week1.mdwn
@@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ Here's how it looks to say the same thing in various of these languages.
 
        It's easy to be lulled into thinking this is a kind of imperative construction. *But it's not!* It's really just a shorthand for the compound "let"-expressions we've already been looking at, taking the maximum syntactically permissible scope. (Compare the "dot" convention in the lambda calculus, discussed above.)
 
 
        It's easy to be lulled into thinking this is a kind of imperative construction. *But it's not!* It's really just a shorthand for the compound "let"-expressions we've already been looking at, taking the maximum syntactically permissible scope. (Compare the "dot" convention in the lambda calculus, discussed above.)
 

+<!-- 

 
 9.     Some shorthand
 
 
 9.     Some shorthand
 


@@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ Here's how it looks to say the same thing in various of these languages.
 
        When a previously-bound variable is rebound in the way we see here, that's called **shadowing**: the outer binding is shadowed during the scope of the inner binding.
 
 
        When a previously-bound variable is rebound in the way we see here, that's called **shadowing**: the outer binding is shadowed during the scope of the inner binding.
 

+-->

 
 Some more comparisons between Scheme and OCaml
 ----------------------------------------------
 
 Some more comparisons between Scheme and OCaml
 ----------------------------------------------