Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>
(fun x -> ((fun x -> x) 2) 3)
(fun x -> ((fun x -> x) 2) 3)
- and there's no more change of state going on here than there is in <code>&exists;x. (F x and &exists;x (not (F x)))</code>.
+ and there's no more change of state going on here than there is in:
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code>∃x. (F x and ∃x (not (F x)))</code>
+ </blockquote>
Some more comparisons between Scheme and OCaml
Some more comparisons between Scheme and OCaml