do-notation links

Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>

diff --git a/translating_between_OCaml_Scheme_and_Haskell.mdwn b/translating_between_OCaml_Scheme_and_Haskell.mdwn
index b893896..300eb61 100644 (file)
--- a/translating_between_OCaml_Scheme_and_Haskell.mdwn
+++ b/translating_between_OCaml_Scheme_and_Haskell.mdwn
@@ -675,6 +675,7 @@ Haskell has more built-in support for monads, but one can define the monads one
        For more details, see:
 
        *       [Haskell wikibook on do-notation](http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/do_Notation)
+       *       [Yet Another Haskell Tutorial on do-notation](http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/YAHT/Monads#Do_Notation)
        *       [Do-notation considered harmful](http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Do_notation_considered_harmful)
 
 *      If you like the Haskell do-notation, there's [a library](http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~carette/pa_monad/) you can compile and install to let you use something similar in OCaml.

diff --git a/week7.mdwn b/week7.mdwn
index 2111ed8..4c74015 100644 (file)
--- a/week7.mdwn
+++ b/week7.mdwn
@@ -465,6 +465,7 @@ See also:
 *      [Haskell wikibook on Understanding Monads](http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Understanding_monads)
 *      [Haskell wikibook on Advanced Monads](http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Advanced_monads)
 *      [Haskell wikibook on do-notation](http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/do_Notation)
+*      [Yet Another Haskell Tutorial on do-notation](http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/YAHT/Monads#Do_Notation)
 
 
 Here are some papers that introduced monads into functional programming: