X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=week1.mdwn;h=c13fa7ca8787de96d87d81694544064fa1654522;hp=36ebdfcc6a48bf72288e2023a0186b9c6665de2d;hb=93600ef645fa8bbb304288ea2161ec06b017762e;hpb=5df775890efe56f0ba68fa03d406018c2549d71e

diff --git a/week1.mdwn b/week1.mdwn
index 36ebdfcc..c13fa7ca 100644
--- a/week1.mdwn
+++ b/week1.mdwn
@@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ Here's how it looks to say the same thing in various of these languages.
 
 	It's easy to be lulled into thinking this is a kind of imperative construction. *But it's not!* It's really just a shorthand for the compound "let"-expressions we've already been looking at, taking the maximum syntactically permissible scope. (Compare the "dot" convention in the lambda calculus, discussed above.)
 
-
 9.	Some shorthand
 
 	OCaml permits you to abbreviate:
@@ -652,6 +651,8 @@ Here's how it looks to say the same thing in various of these languages.
 
 	or in other words, interpret the rest of the file or interactive session with `bar` assigned the function `(lambda (x) B)`.
 
+<!--
+
 
 10.	Shadowing
 
@@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ Here's how it looks to say the same thing in various of these languages.
 
 	When a previously-bound variable is rebound in the way we see here, that's called **shadowing**: the outer binding is shadowed during the scope of the inner binding.
 
+-->
 
 Some more comparisons between Scheme and OCaml
 ----------------------------------------------