X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=schedule_of_topics.mdwn;h=883c648ebe89ee7e529985d61ee2448d15210288;hp=f8e054e4347d1ca29c65294434c1daf8e87500ef;hb=cc9bbc15d910c96094fda02ac1fd131e8fbbd8cd;hpb=24275ff28f0aab1b25c7d90ec10b1119dfda4acf

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index f8e054e4..883c648e 100644
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 10.	[Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
 	<!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> -->
 
-11.	[Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff.
+11.	[Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. [which paper?](http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jeffreck/pub.php)
 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
-13.	Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object"
+13.	Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf)
 
 14.	Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic
 
@@ -62,16 +62,16 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 17.	[Phil/ling application] Expletives
 
 18.	Some references: 
-	*	de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics
-	*	on donkey anaphora and continuations
-	*	Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi
+       * [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf)
+       * [on donkey anaphora and continuations](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
+       * [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf)
 
 19.	Dependent types
 
 ## Side-effects and mutation ##
 
 1.	What difference imperativity makes
-2.	Monads we've seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)
+2.	Monads we've already seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)
 3.	Side-effects in a purely functional setting, via monads
 4.	The basis of monads in category theory
 5.	Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 7.	Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
 
 8.	Passing by reference
-9.	[Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt)
+9.	[Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt))
 
 ## Continuations (continued) ##
 
@@ -88,8 +88,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 2.	Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
 3.	Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
 4.	Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
-5.	[Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
-
+5.	[Phil/ling application] [Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
 
 ## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##