X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=schedule_of_topics.mdwn;h=50a9c33bb1c7b883e9809413e16a5646a0f6bd28;hp=b784a9f371420332e97f5d1788a248ddf057345a;hb=227503eac084d04b374a829310b76ebaec0b2c0e;hpb=b6e49b6bb965279c0af74175c3462787ca0a55a6

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index b784a9f3..50a9c33b 100644
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -40,30 +40,22 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 4.	Zero/bottom types
 5.	Unit type
 6.	Inductive types (numbers, lists)
-7.	"Pattern-matching" or type unpacking
-
-8.	The simply-typed lambda calculus
-
-9.	Parametric polymorphism, System F, "type inference"
-
+7.	"Pattern-matching" or type unpacking<p>
+8.	The simply-typed lambda calculus<p>
+9.	Parametric polymorphism, System F, "type inference"<p>
 10.	[Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
-	<!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> -->
-
+	<!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> --><p>
 11.	[Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. [which paper?](http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jeffreck/pub.php)
 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
-13.	Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf)
-
-14.	Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic
-
+13.	Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf)<p>
+14.	Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic<p>
 15.	The types of continuations; continuations as first-class values
 16.	[Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
-17.	[Phil/ling application] Expletives
-
-18.	Some references: 
+17.	[Phil/ling application] Expletives<p>
+18.	Some references:
        * [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf)
        * [on donkey anaphora and continuations](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
        * [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf)
-
 19.	Dependent types
 
 ## Side-effects and mutation ##
@@ -72,11 +64,9 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 2.	Monads we've already seen, and the "monadic laws" [computer science version: Wadler](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/marktoberdorf/baastad.pdf)
 3.	Side-effects in a purely functional setting, via monads
 4.	The basis of monads in category theory
-5.	Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
-
+5.	Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad<p>
 6.	[Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs" [not sure which paper]
-7.	Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
-
+7.	Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)<p>
 8.	Passing by reference
 9.	[Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt))