X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=index.mdwn;h=ea4f3d916134f00e52fffe330d788a9a7907f804;hp=a764795b55c9be79d349de03bc824208e31356f1;hb=f83bbcefd110dd223a69192921c20f6e56f2d0fd;hpb=b0efc6e28fa824ff4de6974ff680008dd98fe571

diff --git a/index.mdwn b/index.mdwn
index a764795b..ea4f3d91 100644
--- a/index.mdwn
+++ b/index.mdwn
@@ -155,6 +155,15 @@ Practical advice for working with OCaml and/or Haskell (all will be posted soon)
 
 > We will be discussing the readings posted above.
 
+> Topics: [[Kaplan on Plexy|topics/week6_plexy]]; King on that-clauses and "the proposition that P"; Rieppel on Frege and the concept HORSE
+
+(**Week 7**) Thursday March 12
+
+> Topics: [[Combinatory evaluator|topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator]]; Interpreter for Lambda terms; [[Introducing Monads|topics/week7_introducing_monads]]
+
+<!--
+(**Week 8**) Thursday March 26
+-->
 
 <!--
 We've added a [[Monad Library]] for OCaml.
@@ -173,7 +182,7 @@ Rather, it's about a variety of conceptual/logical ideas that have been
 developed in computer science and that linguists and philosophers ought to
 know, or may already be unknowingly trying to reinvent.
 
-Philosphers and linguists tend to reuse the same familiar tools in
+Philosophers and linguists tend to reuse the same familiar tools in
 ever more (sometime spectacularly) creative ways.  But when your only
 hammer is classical logic, every problem looks like modus ponens.  In
 contrast, computer scientists have invested considerable ingenuity in