X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=index.mdwn;h=ea4f3d916134f00e52fffe330d788a9a7907f804;hp=7285e13dd947b5435d3b7014f504de3d78ce1ca7;hb=f83bbcefd110dd223a69192921c20f6e56f2d0fd;hpb=d5c9958f0b19e4cb6e43c9004a76d6562c64d824

diff --git a/index.mdwn b/index.mdwn
index 7285e13d..ea4f3d91 100644
--- a/index.mdwn
+++ b/index.mdwn
@@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ Practical advice for working with OCaml and/or Haskell (all will be posted soon)
 
 > Topics: [[Combinatory evaluator|topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator]]; Interpreter for Lambda terms; [[Introducing Monads|topics/week7_introducing_monads]]
 
+<!--
+(**Week 8**) Thursday March 26
+-->
 
 <!--
 We've added a [[Monad Library]] for OCaml.
@@ -179,7 +182,7 @@ Rather, it's about a variety of conceptual/logical ideas that have been
 developed in computer science and that linguists and philosophers ought to
 know, or may already be unknowingly trying to reinvent.
 
-Philosphers and linguists tend to reuse the same familiar tools in
+Philosophers and linguists tend to reuse the same familiar tools in
 ever more (sometime spectacularly) creative ways.  But when your only
 hammer is classical logic, every problem looks like modus ponens.  In
 contrast, computer scientists have invested considerable ingenuity in