X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=index.mdwn;h=6df8b02ec42c217008927b0619eec5edbd4a2fc7;hp=91106ec3bcf712212d4b55e4d06219b071417c0e;hb=2abb5e0c53d1fc22b17211a9e2fe8d8b3675f234;hpb=9bc7eef7a49c0371f940c349c6de394e4f841cfb

diff --git a/index.mdwn b/index.mdwn
index 91106ec3..6df8b02e 100644
--- a/index.mdwn
+++ b/index.mdwn
@@ -203,8 +203,7 @@ and that is what we recommend you use. If you're already using or comfortable wi
 another Scheme implementation, though, there's no compelling reason to switch.
 
     Another good Scheme implementation is Chicken. For our purposes, this is in some
-respects superior to Racket, and in other respects inferior.
-<!--
+respects superior to Racket, and in other respects inferior. <!--
 Racket doesn't have R7RS-small, and won't anytime soon. :-(
 Also Chicken's library collection seems stronger, or at least better organized and maintained.
 Other R7RS-friendly: [Gauche](http://practical-scheme.net/gauche), [Chibi](https://code.google.com/p/chibi-scheme).
@@ -216,7 +215,7 @@ Other R7RS-friendly: [Gauche](http://practical-scheme.net/gauche), [Chibi](https
 [Lisp](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_%28programming_language%29),
 [Scheme](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language%29),
 [Racket](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_%28programming_language%29), and
-and [Chicken](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHICKEN_%28Scheme_implementation%29).)
+[Chicken](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHICKEN_%28Scheme_implementation%29).)
 
 *   **Caml** is one of two major dialects of *ML*, which is another large
 family of programming languages. Caml has only one active "implementation",
@@ -226,12 +225,11 @@ specifically in OCaml.
 
     (Wikipedia on
 [ML](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_%28programming_language%29),
-[Caml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caml),
-and [OCaml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml).)
+[Caml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caml), and
+[OCaml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml).)
 
 
-*   Those of you with some programming background may have encountered a third
-prominent functional programming language, **Haskell**. This is also used a
+*   **Haskell** is also used a
 lot in the academic contexts we'll be working through. Its surface syntax
 differs from Caml, and there are various important things one can do in
 each of Haskell and Caml that one can't (or can't as easily) do in the