X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lambda.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=hints%2Fassignment_7_hint_3.mdwn;h=53731f70df6e817d291d9ff9429b96c576539106;hp=3fec7e2d3289ad3f8b285f72ba350d30b02cd388;hb=91d23f0c0f3da056a43c0e7c94a7b3d9d51f5783;hpb=0548ea20113afa9723949ce0802aea8a874b2cd4

diff --git a/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn b/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn
index 3fec7e2d..53731f70 100644
--- a/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn
+++ b/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn
@@ -27,6 +27,30 @@ More specifically, \[[expression]] will be a set of `'a discourse_possibility` m
 				(* the reason for returning a triple with () in first position will emerge *)
 				in ((), r',g')
 
-*	At the top of p. 13 (this is in between defs 2.8 and 2.9), GS&V give two examples, one for \[[∃xPx]] and the other for \[[Qx]]. In fact it will be easiest for us to break \[[∃xPx]] into two pieces, \[[∃x]] and \[[Px]]. Let's consider expressions like \[[Px]] (or \[[Qx]]) first.
+*	At the top of p. 13 (this is in between defs 2.8 and 2.9), GS&V give two examples, one for \[[∃xPx]] and the other for \[[Qx]]. In fact it will be easiest for us to break \[[∃xPx]] into two pieces, \[[∃x]] and \[[Px]]. Let's consider expressions like \[[Px]]  first.
+
+	They say that the effect of updating an information state `s` with the meaning of "Qx" should be to eliminate possibilities in which the object associated with the peg associated with the variable `x` does not have the property Q. In other words, if we let `Q` be a function from objects to `bool`s, `s` updated with \[[Qx]] should be `s` filtered by the function `fun (r, g) -> let obj = List.nth g (r 'x') in Q obj`. When `...Q obj` evaluates to `true`, that `(r, g)` pair is retained, else it is discarded.
+
+	Recall that [we said before](/hints/assignment_7_hint_2) that `List.filter (test : 'a -> bool) (u : 'a set) : 'a set` is the same as:
+
+		bind_set u (fun a -> if test a then unit_set a else empty_set)
+
+	Hence, updating `s` with \[[Qx]] should be:
+
+		bind_set s (fun (r, g) -> if (let obj = List.nth g (r 'x') in Q obj) then unit_set (r, g) else empty_set)
+
+	We can call the `(fun (r, g) -> ...)` part \[[Qx]] and then updating `s` with \[[Qx]] will be:
+
+		bind_set s \[[Qx]]
+
+	or as it's written using Haskell's infix notation for bind:
+
+		s >>= \[[Qx]]
+
+*	Now how shall we handle \[[∃x]]. As we said, GS&V really tell us how to interpret \[[∃xPx]], but what they say about this breaks naturally into two pieces, such that we can represent the update of `s` with \[[∃xPx]] as:
+
+		s >>= \[[∃x]] >>= \[[Px]]
+
+