@@ -35,9+35,10 @@ Another way to think of it is to identify expressions not with particular alphab
A third way to think is to identify the lambda formula not with classes of alphabetic sequences, but rather with abstract structures that we might draw like this:
A third way to think is to identify the lambda formula not with classes of alphabetic sequences, but rather with abstract structures that we might draw like this:
-<pre><code>λ ... `___` ...
+<pre><code>λ
+ ... ___ ...
^ |
^ |
-|`______`|
+|______|
</code></pre>
Here there are no bound variables, but there are *bound positions*. We can regard formula like (a) and (b) as just helpfully readable ways to designate these abstract structures.
</code></pre>
Here there are no bound variables, but there are *bound positions*. We can regard formula like (a) and (b) as just helpfully readable ways to designate these abstract structures.