(no commit message)

[lambda.git] / schedule_of_topics.mdwn

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index f8e054e..bc7ec86 100644 (file)
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 10.    [Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
        <!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> -->
 
-11.    [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff.
+11.    [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. [which paper?](http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jeffreck/pub.php)
 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
-13.    Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object"
+13.    Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf)
 
 14.    Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic
 
@@ -62,9 +62,10 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 17.    [Phil/ling application] Expletives
 
 18.    Some references: 
-       *       de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics
+       *       [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf)
+        *       [on donkey anaphora and continuations](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
        *       on donkey anaphora and continuations
-       *       Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi
+       *       [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf)
 
 19.    Dependent types
 
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 7.     Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
 
 8.     Passing by reference
-9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt)
+9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt))
 
 ## Continuations (continued) ##
 
@@ -88,8 +89,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 2.     Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
 3.     Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
 4.     Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
-5.     [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
-
+5.     [Phil/ling application] [Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
 
 ## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##