(no commit message)

[lambda.git] / schedule_of_topics.mdwn

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index 753c058..883c648 100644 (file)
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 13.    Representing lists as folds
 14.    Typical higher-order functions: map, filter, fold
 
 13.    Representing lists as folds
 14.    Typical higher-order functions: map, filter, fold
 

-15.    Recursion exploiting the fold-like representation of numbers and lists
+15.    Recursion exploiting the fold-like representation of numbers and lists (deforestation, zippers)

 16.    General recursion using omega
 17.    The Y combinator(s); more on evaluation strategies
 
 16.    General recursion using omega
 17.    The Y combinator(s); more on evaluation strategies
 


@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 10.    [Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
        <!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> -->
 
 10.    [Phil/ling application] inner/outer domain semantics for positive free logic
        <!-- <http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli/papers/pegasus-JPL.pdf> -->
 

-11.    [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff.
+11.    [Phil/ling application] King vs Schiffer in King 2007, pp 103ff. [which paper?](http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jeffreck/pub.php)

 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators
 12. [Phil/ling application] King and Pryor on that clauses, predicates vs singular property-designators

-13.    Possible excursion: Frege's "On Concept and Object"
+13.    Possible excursion: [Frege's "On Concept and Object"](http://www.persiangig.com/pages/download/?dl=http://sahmir.persiangig.com/document/Frege%27s%20Articles/On%20Concept%20And%20object%20%28Jstore%29.pdf)

 
 14.    Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic
 
 
 14.    Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic
 


@@ -62,35 +62,33 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 17.    [Phil/ling application] Expletives
 
 18.    Some references: 
 17.    [Phil/ling application] Expletives
 
 18.    Some references: 

-       *       de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics
-       *       on donkey anaphora and continuations
-       *       Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi
+       * [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf)
+       * [on donkey anaphora and continuations](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
+       * [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf)

 
 19.    Dependent types
 
 ## Side-effects and mutation ##
 
 1.     What difference imperativity makes
 
 19.    Dependent types
 
 ## Side-effects and mutation ##
 
 1.     What difference imperativity makes

-2.     Monads we've seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)
+2.     Monads we've already seen, and the "monadic laws" (computer science version)

 3.     Side-effects in a purely functional setting, via monads
 4.     The basis of monads in category theory
 5.     Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
 
 3.     Side-effects in a purely functional setting, via monads
 4.     The basis of monads in category theory
 5.     Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
 

-6.     [Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs"
+6.     [Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs" [not sure which paper]

 7.     Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
 
 8.     Passing by reference
 7.     Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
 
 8.     Passing by reference

-9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents"
-
+9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt))

 
 ## Continuations (continued) ##
 
 
 ## Continuations (continued) ##
 

-1.     Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure)
+1.     Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure, expressives)

 2.     Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
 3.     Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
 4.     Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
 2.     Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
 3.     Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
 4.     Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations

-5.     [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
-
+5.     [Phil/ling application] [Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)

 
 ## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##
 
 
 ## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##