(no commit message)

[lambda.git] / schedule_of_topics.mdwn

diff --git a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
index 11d3294..753c058 100644 (file)
--- a/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
+++ b/schedule_of_topics.mdwn
@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 ## The "pure" or untyped lambda calculus ##
 
 1.     Beta reduction
-2.     Subtitution; using alpha-conversion and other strategies
+2.     Substitution; using alpha-conversion and other strategies
 3.     Conversion versus Reduction
 4.     Eta reduction and "extensionality"
-5.     Different evaluation strategies
+5.     Different evaluation strategies (call by name, call by value, etc.)
 6.     Strongly normalizing vs weakly normalizing vs non-normalizing; Church-Rosser Theorem(s)
 
 7.     Encoding pairs (and triples and ...)
@@ -61,7 +61,12 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 16.    [Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
 17.    [Phil/ling application] Expletives
 
-18.    Dependent types
+18.    Some references: 
+       *       de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics
+       *       on donkey anaphora and continuations
+       *       Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi
+
+19.    Dependent types
 
 ## Side-effects and mutation ##
 
@@ -72,18 +77,18 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 5.     Other interesting monads: reader monad, continuation monad
 
 6.     [Phil/ling application] Monsters and context-shifting, e.g. Gillies/von Fintel on "ifs"
-7.     Montague / Yoad Winter? (just have this written down in my notes, I assume Chris will remember the reference)
+7.     Montague / Ben-avi and Winter,  [A modular approach to intensionality](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdocsummary?doi=10.1.1.73.6927)
 
 8.     Passing by reference
-9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor or "coordinated contents"
+9.     [Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents"
 
 
 ## Continuations (continued) ##
 
-1.     Using CPS to handle abortive computations
+1.     Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure)
 2.     Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
 3.     Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
-4.     Delimited continuations
+4.     Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
 5.     [Phil/ling application] Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora
 
 
@@ -92,6 +97,6 @@ This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended s
 1.     Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
 2.     Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)
 3.     Linear logic
-4.     [Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice
+4.     [Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice, imperatives