link to week 5 answers

[lambda.git] / index.mdwn

diff --git a/index.mdwn b/index.mdwn
index 7285e13..3517314 100644 (file)
--- a/index.mdwn
+++ b/index.mdwn
@@ -159,8 +159,14 @@ Practical advice for working with OCaml and/or Haskell (all will be posted soon)
 
 (**Week 7**) Thursday March 12
 
-> Topics: [[Combinatory evaluator|topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator]]; Interpreter for Lambda terms; [[Introducing Monads|topics/week7_introducing_monads]]
+> Topics: [[Combinatory evaluator|topics/week7_combinatory_evaluator]]; Interpreter for Lambda terms; [[Introducing Monads|topics/week7_introducing_monads]] (updated Fri 20 Mar); [[Homework|exercises/assignment7]]
 
+> We posted [[answers to Week 5-6's homework|exercises/assignment5_answers]]. Answers to Week 4's homework coming soon.
+
+
+<!--
+(**Week 8**) Thursday March 26
+-->
 
 <!--
 We've added a [[Monad Library]] for OCaml.
@@ -179,7 +185,7 @@ Rather, it's about a variety of conceptual/logical ideas that have been
 developed in computer science and that linguists and philosophers ought to
 know, or may already be unknowingly trying to reinvent.
 
-Philosphers and linguists tend to reuse the same familiar tools in
+Philosophers and linguists tend to reuse the same familiar tools in
 ever more (sometime spectacularly) creative ways.  But when your only
 hammer is classical logic, every problem looks like modus ponens.  In
 contrast, computer scientists have invested considerable ingenuity in