tweak lists of prog lang implementations
[lambda.git] / index.mdwn
index 91106ec..05f4608 100644 (file)
@@ -203,8 +203,7 @@ and that is what we recommend you use. If you're already using or comfortable wi
 another Scheme implementation, though, there's no compelling reason to switch.
 
     Another good Scheme implementation is Chicken. For our purposes, this is in some
-respects superior to Racket, and in other respects inferior.
-<!--
+respects superior to Racket, and in other respects inferior. <!--
 Racket doesn't have R7RS-small, and won't anytime soon. :-(
 Also Chicken's library collection seems stronger, or at least better organized and maintained.
 Other R7RS-friendly: [Gauche](http://practical-scheme.net/gauche), [Chibi](https://code.google.com/p/chibi-scheme).
@@ -216,7 +215,7 @@ Other R7RS-friendly: [Gauche](http://practical-scheme.net/gauche), [Chibi](https
 [Lisp](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_%28programming_language%29),
 [Scheme](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language%29),
 [Racket](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_%28programming_language%29), and
-and [Chicken](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHICKEN_%28Scheme_implementation%29).)
+[Chicken](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHICKEN_%28Scheme_implementation%29).)
 
 *   **Caml** is one of two major dialects of *ML*, which is another large
 family of programming languages. Caml has only one active "implementation",
@@ -226,8 +225,8 @@ specifically in OCaml.
 
     (Wikipedia on
 [ML](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_%28programming_language%29),
-[Caml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caml),
-and [OCaml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml).)
+[Caml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caml), and
+[OCaml](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml).)
 
 
 *   Those of you with some programming background may have encountered a third