This is very sketchy at this point, but it should give a sense of our intended scope.

## Side-effects and mutation ##

1.	What difference imperativity makes
2.	Side-effects in a purely functional setting, via monads
3.	[Phil/ling application]Semantics for DPL, using state monad
4.	Passing by reference
5.	[Phil/ling application] Fine and Pryor on "coordinated contents" (see, e.g., [Hyper-Evaluativity](http://www.jimpryor.net/research/papers/Hyper-Evaluativity.txt))

14.	Curry-Howard isomorphism between simply-typed lambda and intuitionistic propositional logic<p>
15.	The types of continuations; continuations as first-class values

## Continuations ##

0.	[Phil/ling application] Partee on whether NPs should be uniformly interpreted as generalized quantifiers, or instead "lifted" when necessary. Lifting = a CPS transform.
1.	Using CPS to handle abortive computations (think: presupposition failure, expressives)
2.	Using CPS to do other handy things, e.g., coroutines
3.	Making evaluation order explicit with continuations (could also be done earlier, but I think will be helpful to do after we've encountered mutation)
4.	Delimited (quantifier scope) vs undelimited (expressives, presupposition) continuations
5.	[Phil/ling application] [Barker/Shan on donkey anaphora](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
6.	The continuation monad

## Preemptively parallel computing and linear logic ##

1.	Basics of parallel programming: semaphores/mutexes
2.	Contrasting "preemptive" parallelism to "cooperative" parallelism (coroutines, above)
3.	Linear logic
4.	[Phil/ling application] Barker on free choice, imperatives


##Other##
17.	[Phil/ling application] Expletives<p>
18.	Some references:
       * [de Groote on the lambda-mu calculus in linguistics](http://www.loria.fr/%7Edegroote/papers/amsterdam01.pdf)
       * [on donkey anaphora and continuations](http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.1.1)
       * [Wadler on symmetric sequent calculi](http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/dual-reloaded/dual-reloaded.pdf)
19.	Dependent types