X-Git-Url: http://lambda.jimpryor.net/git/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=hints%2Fassignment_7_hint_3.mdwn;h=59682986299494ce90eb386c7be21780d76301df;hb=d6ac33904ee6021cad8e517d4f5104c3b82f1570;hp=4a159e9e487dce7aebbf4a7cf758df814f3bbfe4;hpb=157b0b898f07c15b13e42718fab380c4ee69d7ea;p=lambda.git diff --git a/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn b/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn index 4a159e9e..59682986 100644 --- a/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn +++ b/hints/assignment_7_hint_3.mdwn @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ More specifically, \[[expression]] will be a set of `'a discourse_possibility` m (* the reason for returning a triple with () in first position will emerge *) in ((), r',g') -* At the top of p. 13 (this is in between defs 2.8 and 2.9), GS&V give two examples, one for \[[∃xPx]] and the other for \[[Qx]]. In fact it will be easiest for us to break \[[∃xPx]] into two pieces, \[[∃x]] and \[[Px]]. Let's consider expressions like \[[Px]] (or \[[Qx]]) first. +* At the top of p. 13 (this is in between defs 2.8 and 2.9), GS&V give two examples, one for \[[∃xPx]] and the other for \[[Qx]]. In fact it will be easiest for us to break \[[∃xPx]] into two pieces, \[[∃x]] and \[[Px]]. Let's consider expressions like \[[Px]] first. - They say that the effect of updating an information state `s` with the formula `Qx` should be to eliminate possibilities in which the object associated with the peg associated with the variable `x` does not have the property Q. In other words, if we let `Q` be a function from objects to `bool`s, `s` updated with \[[Qx]] should be `s` filtered by the function `fun (r, g) -> let obj = List.nth g (r 'x') in Q obj`. + They say that the effect of updating an information state `s` with the meaning of "Qx" should be to eliminate possibilities in which the object associated with the peg associated with the variable `x` does not have the property Q. In other words, if we let `Q` be a function from objects to `bool`s, `s` updated with \[[Qx]] should be `s` filtered by the function `fun (r, g) -> let obj = List.nth g (r 'x') in Q obj`. When `...Q obj` evaluates to `true`, that `(r, g)` pair is retained, else it is discarded. Recall that [we said before](/hints/assignment_7_hint_2) that `List.filter (test : 'a -> bool) (u : 'a set) : 'a set` is the same as: @@ -41,15 +41,17 @@ More specifically, \[[expression]] will be a set of `'a discourse_possibility` m We can call the `(fun (r, g) -> ...)` part \[[Qx]] and then updating `s` with \[[Qx]] will be: - bind_set s [[Qx]] + bind_set s \[[Qx]] or as it's written using Haskell's infix notation for bind: - s >>= [[Qx]] + s >>= \[[Qx]] * Now how shall we handle \[[∃x]]. As we said, GS&V really tell us how to interpret \[[∃xPx]], but what they say about this breaks naturally into two pieces, such that we can represent the update of `s` with \[[∃xPx]] as: - s >>= [[∃x]] >>= [[Px]] +

+s >>= \[[∃x]] >>= \[[Px]]
+